How Educators Can Break Cycles of Redlined Segregation

January 30, 2019 BY Autumn Miller

When neighborhood school maps are influenced by decades-old segregationist housing policies, how are today’s leading educators creating equalities? To start, many are taking an honest look at redlining and how that’s played a part in creating segregated schools.

A Refresher on Redlining
In the first half of the last century, America’s middle class grew in part because homeownership grew. Systematic mortgage lending is one of the factors that made this possible. But it also further entrenched segregation.

Mortgages were a lot easier for whites to get because of redlining. Redlining is the practice of denying borrowers access to credit based on the location of properties in minority or economically disadvantaged neighborhoods.1 Sanctioned by The Federal Housing Administration policies, redlining effectively “made it more difficult for low-income minorities to buy homes” and “institutionalized discriminatory lending in government-backed mortgages that reinforced residential segregation in American cities.”2 And this was widespread nationally – far beyond the “Jim Crow” south.

Why it matters today.
In 1968, the Fair Housing Act banned racial discrimination in housing. And yet, a 2018 NCRC study confirmed that 3 out of the 4 neighborhoods that were “redlined” on government maps 80 years ago still continue to struggle economically to this day.1 And because our schools are tied so closely to our neighborhoods, the remnants of redlining are still very much alive today.

Pick a city anywhere in America. Will you find concentrations of minority and/or low-income students in that city’s schools? Very probably, yes. Segregation in schools is actually growing. Per the National Center on Education Statistics, “the number of segregated schools (defined as schools where less than 40 percent of students are white), has approximately doubled between 1996 and 2016. In that same span, the percentage of children of color attending such a school rose from 59 to 66 percent.”3

We can see how dangerous this is for all students when we look at the facts: students in segregated schools with concentrated poverty have poorer academic outcomes — regardless of a student’s own economic status. Conversely, students in integrated schools have higher average test scores, are more likely to enroll in college, are less likely to drop out, and are reducing the racial achievement gap.4 The evidence is clear: diversity is good for academic outcomes on all fronts.

So what can a district or charter school leader do?
A few things…

Idea #1

At the city or district level, educators need to honestly examine neighborhoods, zones, and catchment areas first. Look for any leftover influence of segregation-era policies. Redefine attendance boundaries and reject the geographic boundaries of neighborhoods dictated by the practice of redlining. In place of inherited boundaries, districts can let families select their schools based on the school programs/support/services they themselves prioritize. Open enrollment — or even unified enrollment — systems allow this to happen.

Idea #2

At the school organization level, educators should implement new schools and/or programs specifically designed to bridge divisions in communities segregated by race, socioeconomics, extreme poverty and/or other environmental stressors. These can be district schools, charter schools, magnet schools, STEM, arts, dual language, or Montessori programs. Any type of education that’s in high-demand is appealing to all families, regardless of their socioeconomic status. And by offering the specialized schools/programs your community values, you’re then capable of filing campuses with students from every socioeconomic background.

Idea #3

Most importantly, access to all schools must be equitable. Choice, without equitable access, is a dangerous road back to segregation.

At the very least, access equity means implementing safeguards for families of low-socioeconomic status:

  • Use an Application Management platform that’s mobile phone-friendly and multilingual so every family can submit applications and accept offers without needing transportation, a personal computer, or at-home broadband.
  • Deploy a Registration & Re-enrollment system that allows families to enroll with only a phone number instead of requiring an email address as some low-income or foreign-born families don’t have email.
  • Give families an online SchoolFinder so learning about choice and discovering all of their school options can be done in an easy, transparent, and fair manner using just a mobile phone.

At best, access equity is created when school networks and districts intentionally create diverse-by-design campuses:

  • Use a highly configurable Lottery Management application to reserve a certain percentage of seats for minority or low-socioeconomic families, ensuring integration on a classroom level.

Case Study: Oakland USD

Curious what taking on redlining looks like in practice? Some of the incredible educators at the Oakland Unified School District have been open about their area’s struggle to overcome redline-influenced inequalities. Hoping to help other educators, they’ve shared what’s working for them with us in An Educator’s Blueprint for Building Social Justice. Grab a copy of the guide for their strategies and case study.